Ohana Helps · two-sided, full-stack home-services marketplace

Watch it expand — Arizona today, a worldwide multi-service platform by Year 20.

Handyman is the first launch category. The U.S. is the starting geography. Neither is the destination.

Round target · fixed$750,000not investor adjustable
Your investment$5.0K
Capital raised toward target · derived$5.0K / $750K

$5.0K / $750K · 0.7% funded · $745K remaining

$0 already committed by other current-round investors + $5.0K your investment = $5.0K raised · 0.7% funded · $745K remaining

Move your investment and see what Ohana can do with the capital actually raised toward the $750,000 target. There are no other current-round commitments today, so your investment is that capital.

Which service network are you watching

Composite view: how many independent service networks are live in each place. Each network's footprint is calculated separately and then summed.

Years 0–1 — prove the handyman launch and the Phoenix operating model before anything scales.

1 service network2–3 networks4–6 networks7+ networks

Service networks live

0 / 9 categories

Handyman only — every other category is still in build.

Every other category is a separate build with its own market order — none of them inherit handyman's geography.

Year 2ModeledSlower than the intended path

Arizona proves the marketplace: real booked appointments, real provider earnings.

  • Geography
    Arizona home base and the first approved markets.
  • Services
    Handyman live as the launch category, on a platform built for every home service.
  • Company
    Founder-led operations with a small product team.
  • Financing
    Current round.
Productive providers
10
Appointments / yr
94
Ohana Net Revenue / yr
$5.5K
EBITDA / yr · -3093%
-$170K

Company value range
$11K$38K

Independent service networks at Y0.0

International expansion

Each service network has its own worldwide rollout: its own candidate countries, its own order, its own provider credential rules and its own local pricing. Country and service legality is validated with local counsel before any launch, and expansion begins when capital, build duration and readiness allow it — not on a calendar date.

There is no single Ohana country list. Each service has an independent worldwide rollout, and country/service legality — licensing, provider classification, insurance and pricing — is validated locally before launch. Select a category to see that network's own country sequence.

What is still being decided

  • · Every service network runs its own worldwide sequence. There is no single Ohana country list, and handyman's researched six are not the company footprint.
  • · Countries beyond a service's existing research are screened candidates: they are modeled as entered only after a country/service readiness gate, and each one still needs local-counsel validation of licensing, provider classification, insurance and consumer rules.
  • · Handyman's six researched countries (Canada, UK, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, Mexico) are the only country entries backed by existing project compatibility research today. Everything else in the Year-20 scenario is a derived screening result.
  • · Local pricing, tax, payment and provider-credential configuration is per country and per service; it is never inherited from another network.

Planning ranges

  • Years 0–1Prove the handyman launch and the Phoenix / Arizona operating model.
  • Years 1–3Expand U.S. geography and begin launching adjacent service categories.
  • Years 3–5Broader multi-state presence, multiple categories, and a first carefully selected international launch if readiness gates pass.
  • Years 5–10Accelerate both geography and service breadth.
  • Years 10–15Major international markets, most planned service families, deeper U.S. density.
  • Years 15–20Mature network density, repeat usage, broad service coverage, stronger economics, selective additional countries.

These are planning ranges, not promises. Readiness gates and the size of this round can move every stage earlier or later.

What unlocks the next step

New U.S. market

A market opens when the last one is healthy, not on a calendar date.

  • · Stable booking growth in existing markets
  • · Providers filling enough of their week
  • · Customer acquisition cost inside plan
  • · Strong completion and rebooking rates
  • · Enough provider supply recruited locally
  • · Cash to fund the launch without destabilising live markets

New service category

A category opens once Ohana can actually run it end to end.

  • · Booking and quoting logic for the work
  • · Provider qualification requirements defined
  • · Insurance and legal review complete
  • · Warranty and support workflow in place
  • · Provider training and onboarding built
  • · Provider supply plus evidence of customer demand

New country

International entry follows a playbook that already works at home.

  • · Repeatable domestic launch playbook
  • · Multi-service operations working, not handyman alone
  • · Dedicated legal and operations capacity
  • · Payments, tax and insurance readiness
  • · Capital to launch without needing instant profitability

How confident is each horizon

Years 0–2 · operating model

Built bottom-up from what we already pay, already charge and already measure: current rate, current vendor economics, current acquisition cost, our real bills, our developer costs and the market-prep time we have observed.

Years 2–5 · grounded plan

Still calculated by the same engine — team growth, reinvested profit, market launches, recruiting and coverage — with planning inputs stated openly instead of hidden inside a growth rate.

Years 5+ · scenarios

Depends on execution, market conditions, financing and legal readiness. Presented as scenarios that move earlier or later with capital and readiness, not as forecasts.

See the math — how a new service or a new country actually gets built

A new service family

Base planning estimate of 6 months of development before the first launch (410 months depending on licensing), 23 developers assigned and 23 subject matter experts in that trade. It then launches in one market and is validated for 3 months before rollout accelerates. Developer cost is known at $7,000 per developer per month; expert fees are a pending input, not an invented figure.

  • · Service catalog and quoting logic for the trade
  • · Local pricing configuration, market by market
  • · Provider qualification, licensing and credential checks
  • · Insurance, warranty and dispute/support workflow
  • · Routing, compliance and documentation rules
  • · Provider training and onboarding for the trade
  • · Booking and transaction logic, then launch readiness

A new country

612 months of dedicated country setup before the first launch, depending on complexity, then 4 months validating the first in-country market before broader rollout. A country build does not start until the domestic playbook is repeatable — 12+ states live and multi-service operations working at home — and until the company can carry it.

  • · Local legal and licensing research, service by service
  • · Entity, tax and payment requirements
  • · Insurance and warranty framework
  • · Independent-provider classification review
  • · Local pricing, currency and payment configuration
  • · Customer and provider terms
  • · Communications and support setup
  • · Local geography, routing and search presence
  • · Local subject-matter expert involvement
  • · Platform and compliance adaptation by developers
  • · First-market launch and validation before country-wide rollout

Scheduled builds in this scenario

    In this scenario the company does not reach sustained profit at the scale needed to fund build teams from retained earnings, so expansion stays financing-dependent.

    Local pricing and local rules

    Local pricing and local legal/service rules are configured market by market. Only the Phoenix rate is measured today; every other market carries its own configurable rate, scope rules and provider qualification rather than a copy of Phoenix.

    Still to be sourced

    • · Subject-matter expert engagement fees per new service build — not sourced; modeled as a pending capital input with no dollar figure asserted.
    • · Per-country legal, entity, tax and insurance setup budgets — not sourced; represented as pending, never invented.
    • · Local pricing tables outside the measured Phoenix reference rate — the architecture is market-by-market, but only Phoenix carries a measured rate today.

    Geography comes from the real rollout queue · Approved state waves + ordered anchor markets Markets open in the approved order — Phoenix first, then wave by wave, strongest anchor markets first. How many are open by a given year is set by developer capacity, which the round funds. No coverage percentage is assumed and then backfilled onto the map.

    Each category carries its own model · Nine analysed categories, separate economics Handyman, cleaning, pressure washing, carpentry, pool, masonry, welding, plumbing and electrical each have their own rate, job length, household attach, repeat frequency, take rate, licensing posture and its own build lifecycle. The wedge's assumptions are never copied across the catalog.

    Provider population is derived, not multiplied · Covered households ÷ what one provider can deliver For every live category in every live geography: covered households × that category's attach rate × its jobs per household, divided by the jobs one provider delivers inside the governing 32 billable hours per week.

    International comes from the manifest · Named countries and their own household counts Only countries in the explicit international manifest contribute, using their own public household counts, and each category enters behind that country's own build (legal, tax, payments, insurance, platform adaptation) plus its licensing configuration.

    Financial layer from the operating engine · Processing efficiency and margin glide Ohana Take converts to Net Revenue at the processing efficiency measured in the connected operating model, then margin glides from the modeled margin toward a mature platform band as coverage matures.

    Value methodology · 2× / 5× / 7× Ohana Net Revenue Applied to Ohana Net Revenue — never to gross market revenue — and always shown as a range.